language: Deutsch   Français   italiano   Español   Português   日本語   russian   arabic   norwegian   swedish   danish   Nederlands   finland   ireland   English  

Letters - complaint letter generator

Letters Formal business letter Word Recommendation letter Word Simple cover letter Word Resume cover letter (violet) Word Reference Letter from Teacher Word Resume cover letter (green) Word Resume cover letter (chronological) Word Modern letterhead Word CV Cover letter Word Personal letterhead Word Cover letter for functional resume Word Cover letter (blue) Word Resume cover letter for temporary position Word Resume cover letter for unsolicited resume Word Fax cover sheet (Technology design) Word Template for personal letters (elegant gray-green design) Word Business letter (Green Forest design) Word Business letter (blue border and color gradient) Word Business letter Word Resume cover letter (chronological) Word Resume cover letter when referred Word Resume reference list Word Business letter (simple design) Word Letter (Oriel theme) Word Business letter (Median theme) Word Employee referral form Word Business fax cover sheet Word Fax cover sheet (standard format) Word Fax cover sheet (Professional design) Word Cover letter in response to ad, short Word Letterhead (Green Wave design) Word Business letterhead stationery (Simple design) Word Letterhead (Green Wave design) Word Halloween stationery Word Chronological resume reference sheet Word Entry-level resume reference sheet Word Functional resume reference sheet Word Cover letter for chronological resume Word Cover letter for entry-level resume Word Fax cover (Blue Border design) Word Fax cover sheet (Green Gradient design) Word Fax cover sheet (Blue Background design) Word Stationery (sun and sand design) Word Stationery (Floral design) Word Fax cover sheet Word Stationery (floral design) Word Letter (Equity theme) Word Letter (Urban theme) Word Fax cover sheet (Urban theme) Word Letter (Origin theme) Word Fax cover sheet (Origin theme) Word Letter (Oriel theme) Word Fax cover sheet (Oriel theme) Word Fax cover sheet (Median theme) Word Fax cover sheet (Equity theme) Word Personal fax cover sheet Word Letterhead and envelope Word Cover letter with salary requirements Word Cover letter in response to ad, short Word Fax cover sheet (Business design) Word Fax cover sheet (Professional design) Word Fax cover sheet (Technology design) Word Letter (Business design) Word Letter (Academic design) Word Cover letter for entry-level resume Word Letter (Business design) Word Letter (Academic design) Word Cover letter in response to ad Word Fax cover sheet Word Mail merge fax (Origin theme) Word Complaint letter requesting reimbursement for lost luggage Word Complaint l complaint-letter-generator-rid-0.html. us digital millennium copyright act googleetter about damaged luggage Word Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
complaint letter generator

moncler shoes mens
outlet moncler milano stazione centrale
saks moncler mens
moncler baby fleece onesie
saks moncler hat Home

Sample Copyright Complaint Steps

HostGator requires DMCA notices to be filed via fax or letter. The complaint must include full contact information in the complaint (including phone number). We will call and verify. Email (unless digitally signed by a verified and trusted third party) is not an acceptable medium for legal complaints. This ticket system has received what appears to be a possible DMCA complaint, but one or more of the following are missing: (a) the complaint does not contain sufficient information (b) the format of the complaint is inconsistent with the requirements of the DMCA (c) the complaint has been submitted via email without proper authentication (d) full contact information is missing. We will need you to re-submit your claim, using the proper format, including sufficient details, via postal mail or fax. Instructions on how to do so follow.

It is our policy to respond to clear notices of alleged copyright infringement. This response describes the information that should be present in these notices. It is designed to make submitting notices of alleged infringement to us as straightforward as possible while reducing the number of notices that we receive that are fraudulent or difficult to understand or verify. The form of notice specified below is consistent with the form suggested by the United States Digital Millennium Copyright Act (the text of which can be found at the U.S. Copyright Office Web Site, ) but we will respond to notices of this form from other jurisdictions as well.

To file a notice of infringement with us, you must provide a written communication that sets forth the items specified below. Please note that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys' fees) if you materially misrepresent that a product or activity is infringing your copyrights. Accordingly, if you are not sure whether material available online infringes your copyright, we suggest that you first contact an attorney.

Identify in sufficient detail the copyrighted work that you believe has been infringed upon (for example, "The copyrighted work at issue is the text that appears on ") or other information sufficient to specify the copyrighted work being infringed (for example, "The copyrighted work at issue is 'Intellectual Property: Valuation, Exploitation, and Infringement Damages' by Gordon V. Smith, published by Wiley, ISBN #047168323X").

Identify the material that you claim is infringing the copyrighted work listed in item #1 above. You must identify each web page that allegedly contains infringing material. This requires you to provide the URL for each allegedly infringing result, document, or item.

An example:
Infringing Web Pages:

Provide information reasonably sufficient to permit us to contact you.

Provide information, if possible, sufficient to permit us to notify the owner/administrator of the allegedly infringing webpage or other content (email address is preferred).

Include the following statement: I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above as allegedly infringing is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.

Include the following statement: I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

Sign the paper.

For the fastest processing and response we ask that DMCA complaints be submitted through our online form at

Or faxed to us at

(281) 476-7801, Attn: Abuse Department, DMCA Complaint

While not recommended you may also mail your request to us at

HostGator LLC Attn: Abuse Department, DMCA Complaint 5005 Mitchelldale, Suite #100 Houston, TX 77092 United States of America

Please allow routing and scanning time for mailed DMCA complaints.

Regardless of whether we may be liable for such infringement under local country law or United States law, we may respond to these notices by removing or disabling access to material claimed to infringe and/or terminating users of our services. If we remove or disable access in response to such a notice, we will make a good-faith attempt to contact the owner or administrator of the affected site or content so that the owner or administrator may make a counter notification.

We may also document notices of alleged infringement on which we act. As with all legal notices, a copy of the notice may be made available to the public and sent to one or more third parties who may make it available to the public.

In order to ensure that copyright owners do not wrongly insist on the removal of materials that actually do not infringe their copyrights, the safe harbor provisions require service providers to notify the subscribers if their materials have been removed and to provide them with an opportunity to send a written notice to the service provider stating that the material has been wrongly removed. [512(g)]

If a subscriber provides a proper "counter-notice" claiming that the material does not infringe copyrights, the service provider must then promptly notify the claiming party of the individual's objection. [512(g)(2)] If the copyright owner does not bring a lawsuit in district court within 14 days, the service provider is then required to restore the material to its location on its network. [512(g)(2)(C)]

If it is determined that the copyright holder misrepresented its claim regarding the infringing material, the copyright holder then becomes liable to the OSP for any damages that resulted from the improper removal of the material. [512(f)]

Automatic complaint-letter generator. Discussion in ' Open Discussion ' started by zen_master , Dec 5, 2005 .

zen_master >>Tech hating Squirrel Messages: 317 Likes Received: 0 This website is too much. It lets you generate a complaint letter about any company or person you want. :lol: You also apparently get a different letter every time. Here's an out take from my letter about George W. Bush: Mr. Bush's favorite buzzword these days is "crisis". He likes to tell us that we have a crisis on our hands. He then argues that the only reasonable approach to combat this crisis is for him to threaten the existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. Click to expand... Here's the link :wave: zen_master , Dec 5, 2005 #1 Advertisement Kazuya The seeker of perfection Messages: 3,628 Likes Received: 0 :lol: i entered Ngemu Mods and it came with this, i just had to change his for their: Recent troubling developments prompt me to revisit a subject I've discussed in the past: Ngemu Mods and their plan to perpetrate acts of the most diabolic character. Here's my side of the story: I would be grateful if they would take a little time from their rigorous schedule to make a cause célèbre out of exposing their dissertations for what they really are. Of course, pigs will grow wings and fly before that ever happens. It seems ironic that their views are antiquated, misguided, and pudibund, given that an armed revolt against them is morally justified. However, I think that it is not yet strategically justified. Ngemu Mods can't possibly believe that trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. They're dirty, but they're not that dirty. I've received appreciative notes from academic psychologists and students of culture who deplore the misapplication of their subjects by ideologues like them. I challenge them to move from their broad derogatory generalizations to specific instances to prove otherwise. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that Ngemu Mods are blinded by greed. Kazuya , Dec 5, 2005 #2 Razor Blade Locked and Loaded Staff Member Moderator Messages: 12,032 Likes Received: 0 What a waste of time ... I love it! Razor Blade , Dec 5, 2005 #3 Vanit Heretic Junior Contributor Messages: 2,766 Likes Received: 0 I don't normally talk about how learning the truth can be a painful experience, especially for Mr. George W. Bush, Jr.. However, in this case I'm going to make an exception. I figure it's okay because Mr. Bush is entirely unmovable by truth or reason. One of my objectives is to keep the faith. He has, at times, called me "prissy" or "larcenous". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to sell us fibs and fear mixed with a generous dollop of mandarinism. I just want to say that he is far more interested in fattening himself on the various processes of decay in our society than he is in helping us build a new understanding that can transport us to tomorrow. There's nothing controversial about that view. It's a fact, pure and simple. It was a fact long before anyone realized that when Mr. Bush hears anyone say that for all of his professed concern for human rights, Mr. Bush has yet to take a firm and unambiguous stand against those infantile scofflaws who pilfer the national treasure, his answer is to tear down everything that can possibly be regarded as a support of cultural elevation. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to invigorate the effort to reach solutions by increasing the scope of the inquiry, rather than by narrowing or abandoning it. The significance of this is that the next time Mr. Bush decides to assail all that is holy, he should think to himself, cui bono? -- who benefits? I used a phrase a few moments ago. I referred to his sycophants as "coldhearted demoniacs." You ought to memorize that phrase, because, frankly, he can't possibly believe that obscurity, evasiveness, incomprehensibility, indirectness, and ambiguity are marks of depth and brilliance. He's unprofessional, but he's not that unprofessional. Now, I'm going to be honest here. Mr. Bush thinks I'm trying to say that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. Wait! I just heard something. Oh, never mind; it's just the sound of the point zooming way over Mr. Bush's head. Because I unfortunately lack the psychic powers that enable Mr. Bush to "know" matters for which there is no reliable evidence, I cannot forecast when he will next try to require schoolchildren to be taught that genocide, slavery, racism, and the systematic oppression, degradation, and exploitation of most of the world's people are all utterly justified. But I can unequivocally say that Mr. Bush does not merely show us a gross miscarriage of common judgment. He does so consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. Mr. Bush has no fixed ethical principles. Sounds pretty garrulous, doesn't it? But is it any more so than Mr. Bush's adversarial rantings? Everybody loves a good game of hide-and-seek: find the person, find the hidden item, or, in Mr. Bush's case, find the hidden agenda. Our future is hopeless indeed if we do not shoo Mr. Bush away like the annoying bug that he is, but what makes matters thoroughly intolerable is knowing that Mr. Bush operates on an international scale to transform our society into a mealymouthed war machine. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to comment on a phenomenon that has and will continue to doctor evidence and classification systems and make moonstruck generalizations to support harebrained, preconceived views. While he is indubitably entitled to ignore good advice from intelligent people, many people are convinced that by promoting both nonrepresentationalism and Dadaism, his demands are doubly eccentric. I can't comment on that, but I can say that I welcome Mr. Bush's comments. However, Mr. Bush needs to realize that my cause is to speak up and speak out against him. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that Mr. Bush's claim that we have no reason to be fearful about the criminally violent trends in our society today and over the past ten to fifteen years is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind. Behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when Mr. Bush denies ever having strived to bad-mouth worthy causes. There is something grievously wrong with those inane ignoramuses who teach the next generation how to hate -- and whom to hate. Shame on the lot of them! You may balk at this, but we've all heard Mr. Bush yammer and whine about how he's being scapegoated again, the poor dear. Don't be intimidated by his threat to dress up his profit motive in the cloak of selfless altruism. To say that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength is judgmental nonsense and untrue to boot. Mr. Bush's hariolations do not come without a price. But it doesn't stop there. Mr. Bush says that he needs a little more time to clean up his act. As far as I'm concerned, Mr. Bush's time has run out. In such a brief letter as this, I certainly cannot refute all the endeavors of sniffish, snappish upstarts, but perhaps I can brush away some of their most deliberate and flagrant reinterpretations of historic events. Other than that, people tell me that sometimes, what you don't know can hurt you. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. Aside from the fact that it is dysfunctional and more than Pecksniffian to believe that Mr. Bush is the one who will lead us to our great shining future, Mr. Bush may dispense outright misinformation and flashlight-under-the-chin ghost stories right after he reads this letter. Let him. In the near future, I will tackle the multinational death machine that Mr. Bush is currently constructing. Calling Mr. Bush's apparatchiks reckless practitioners of frotteurism may be accurate, but if Mr. Bush thinks that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong, then he's sadly mistaken. I fear that, over time, his diatribes will be seen as uncontested fact, because many people are afraid to snap his apologists out of their trance. I repeat: I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I suspect that there is, because if he would abandon his name-calling and false dichotomies it would be much easier for me to empower the oppressed to control their own lives. In the past, I've said that as Mr. Bush feels less and less need to conceal his expositions, he makes increasingly open moves towards abusive priggism. Were I to make such a generalization today, it would contain a few "weasel words" -- an escape hatch or that indispensable cliche that even Mr. Bush must concede that it has been, and is, my great undertaking to call for proper disciplinary action against him and his stooges. But because "impetuous" hardly seems like a strong enough word to describe him, I am not ready to retract my conviction or to recant error. I, speaking as someone who is not an ill-bred, discourteous spieler, am not trying to save the world -- I gave up that pursuit a long time ago. But I am trying to call a spade a spade. In a sense, I've heard Mr. Bush say that honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. Was that just a slip of the lip or is Mr. Bush secretly trying to skewer me over a pit barbecue? This isn't such an easy question to answer, but let me take a stab at it: He argues that I am indelicate for wanting to knock some sense into him. I should point out that this is almost the same argument that was made against Copernicus and Galileo almost half a millennium ago. His idiotic claim that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles is just that, an idiotic claim. In order to understand the motivation behind Mr. Bush's methods of interpretation, it is important first to face our problems realistically, get to the root of our problems, and be determined to solve them. If Mr. Bush is going to make an emotional appeal, then he should also include a rational argument. If his plan to lead a hateful jihad against those who oppose him is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to indicate in a rough and approximate way the two apolaustic tendencies that I believe are the main driving force of modern Jacobinism. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that he can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. Mr. Bush could promote a culture of dependency and failure. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that other distasteful, antihumanist sods are also consumed with a desire to create an untrue and injurious impression of an entire people? I ask because he is absolutely determined to believe that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. Let me close where I began: Mr. George W. Bush, Jr.'s snow jobs have put our proud nation on a path which, if left unchanged, may well cause it to follow the Roman Empire into historical oblivion. Click to expand... Its funny, the figure's of speach actually refer to things that he's done. I should submit this. PS: Love the new sig Razor. Vanit , Dec 6, 2005 #4 RZetlin General of Tangerines Messages: 3,934 Likes Received: 0 This is quite accurate. What I am about to say is strictly off the record. On that understanding, I shall give you candidly and without circumlocution the best estimate of our present plight that I have been able to make. For complete details, I refer you to my forthcoming book on the subject. I shall here mention only a few random items that may be new or especially interesting to you. For instance, Pres. George W. Bush truly believes that he is beyond reproach. I hope you realize that that's just an unruly pipe dream from a belligerent pipe, and that in the real world, one of Pres. Bush's serfs keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that Pres. Bush can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. The studies are full of "if"s, "possible"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that I wish that one of the innumerable busybodies who are forever making "statistical studies" about nonsense would instead make a statistical study that means something. For example, I'd like to see a statistical study of Pres. Bush's capacity to learn the obvious. Also worthwhile would be a statistical study of how many choleric scatterbrains realize that you may be worried that Pres. Bush will hamstring our efforts to explain a few facets of this confusing world around us in the immediate years ahead. If so, then I share your misgivings. But let's not worry about that now. Instead, let's discuss my observation that Pres. Bush is entirely mistaken if he believes that his grievances are all sweetness and light. Pres. Bush is truly up to something. I don't know exactly what, but this is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, where the state would be eager to peddle the snake oil of refractory, shabby voyeurism. Not yet, at least. But he always tries to shift blame from himself to possession-obsessed, irreligionism-oriented goofballs. Pres. Bush will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact, because if he didn't, you might come to realize that I am not fooled by his gormless and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that Pres. Bush hates it when you say that he can't discuss anything without talking about extremism. He really hates it when you say that. Try saying it to him sometime, if you have a thick skin and don't mind having him shriek insults at you. Those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to enhance people's curiosity, critical acumen, and aesthetic sensitivity have no right to complain when he and his companions portray censorious sots as lunkheads. Pres. Bush can't relate to anyone other than disorderly calumniators. But it goes further than that; Pres. Bush uses big words like "compartmentalization" to make himself sound important. For that matter, benevolent Nature has equipped another puny creature, the skunk, with a means of making itself seem important, too. Although Pres. Bush's prank phone calls may reek like a skunk, there is still hope for our society, real hope -- not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of the worst classes of baleful, improvident sciolists there are, but the hope that makes you eager to dole out acerbic criticism of Pres. Bush and his phalanx of imperious dupes. I realize that academicism is a tremendous problem in our society, but does it constantly have to be thrown in our faces? To ask that question another way, what exactly is Pres. Bush trying to hide? The answer is rather depressing but I'll tell you anyway. The answer begins with the observation that Pres. Bush finds reality too difficult to swallow. Or maybe it just gets lost between the sports and entertainment pages. In either case, I plan to make Pres. Bush answer for his wrongdoings. Are you with me -- or against me? Whatever you decide, Pres. Bush's intimates argue that newspapers should report only on items he agrees with. These are the same scummy bureaucrats who ascribe opinions to me that I don't even hold. This is no coincidence; if Pres. Bush wanted to, he could create an intimidating, hostile, or demeaning environment. He could force me to feel disconnected from reality. And he could threaten the existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. We must not allow Pres. Bush to do any of these. In public, Pres. Bush vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, Pres. Bush never fails to conspire with evil. Worst of all, our children's children would never forgive us for letting him shift blame from those who benefit from oppression to those who suffer from it. I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like him want to impose a particular curriculum, vision of history, and method of pedagogy on our school systems. Do we not, as rational men and women, owe it to both our heritage and our posterity to clarify and correct some of the inaccuracies present in Pres. Bush's litanies? I, not being one of the many contumelious, flippant slanderers of this world, think we do. Granted, Pres. Bush conducts himself in a superciliously pompous manner. But Pres. Bush believes that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. That's just wrong. He further believes that society is supposed to be lenient towards petulant muttonheads. Wrong again! In closing, Pres. George W. Bush's magic-bullet explanations just don't stand up. Click to expand... RZetlin , Dec 7, 2005 #5 Mad AKA snkmad Messages: 4,030 Likes Received: 0 Just loved this!! So here I am taking time out of my busy schedule to let you and maybe a few other people know that Blizzard should get off its pedestal and walk a day in our shoes. Permit me this forum to rant. In order for us to realize more happiness in our lives, we need to understand that Blizzard should stop and savor life, not prime the pump of escapism. We can therefore extrapolate that it is interpersonally exploitative. That is, it takes advantage of others to achieve its own quixotic ends. Why does it do that? This can be answered most easily by stating that if you read between the lines of its treatises, you'll definitely find that we've tolerated its arrogant hijinks long enough. It's time to lose our patience and chill our kindness. It's time to give parents the means to protect their children. It's time to shout to the world that even its horoscope says it's perfidious. But there's the rub; I wonder if it really believes the things it says. It knows they're not true, doesn't it? The complete answer to that question is a long, sad story. I've answered parts of that question in several of my previous letters, and I'll answer other parts in future ones. For now, I'll just say that it will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let it create a beachhead for organized Jacobinism. At least putting up with another Blizzard hissy fit is easier than convincing Blizzard's encomiasts that we must break the mold and stray from the path of conventional wisdom. As mentioned above, however, that is not enough. It is necessary to do more. It is necessary to begin the debate about Blizzard's conclusions. Blizzard demands obeisance from its goombahs. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Blizzard forces them to empty garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations on the clean garments of honorable people. Everybody is probably familiar with the cliche that being forced to listen to Blizzard yap on and on about antipluralism is about as desirable as being flayed alive and rolled in salt. Well, there's a lot of truth in that cliche. Blizzard maintains that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. Perhaps it would be best for it to awaken from its delusional narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that if I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that sin is good for the soul. In fact, that's exactly what Blizzard does as part of its quest to reinforce the concept of collective guilt that is the root of all prejudice. How do you think Blizzard will get its hands on all of the incriminating documents about it that I have in my possession? A secretive home or office invasion, a knock on the door, or its favored battering-ram incursion? You see, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, wouldn't want to abuse science by using it as a mechanism of ideology. I would, on the other hand, love to make a cause célèbre out of exposing Blizzard's remarks for what they really are. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. Blizzard contends that everyone and everything discriminates against it -- including the writing on the bathroom stalls -- and that, therefore, it should be a given a direct pipeline to the National Treasury. This bizarre pattern of thinking leads to strange conclusions. For example, it convinces biggety deviants (as distinct from the predatory recidivists who prefer to chirrup while hopping from cloud to cloud in Nephelococcygia) that merit is adequately measured by Blizzard's methods and qualifications. In reality, contrariwise, if I didn't sincerely believe that it would be downright dishonest for Blizzard to alter laws, language, and customs in the service of regulating social relations, then I wouldn't be writing this letter. As long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, Blizzard's loyalists don't really care that I myself am appalled by the vast generalizations in its claim that there's no difference between normal people like you and me and lubricious witlings. It follows from this that Blizzard thinks it would be a great idea to replace our natural soul with an artificial one. Even if we overlook the logistical impossibilities of such an idea, the underlying premise is still flawed. Of course, I'm generalizing a little here. But that's only because Blizzard's scornful notions can be quite educational. By studying them, students can observe firsthand the consequences of having an organization consumed with paranoia, fear, hatred, and ignorance. Pardon my saying so, but Blizzard's surrogates get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with Blizzard, and meeting some other lethargic derelicts is merely a social event. They're not even aware that Blizzard's subordinates have discounted their brain as a useless organ. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: We must work together to tell you things that Blizzard doesn't want you to know. What can you do to help? For starters, you might want to call for proper disciplinary action against Blizzard and its chums. I personally derive great satisfaction in doing that sort of thing because one of Blizzard's trained seals keeps throwing "scientific" studies at me, claiming they prove that Blizzard has the authority to issue licenses for practicing paternalism. The studies are full of "if"s, "possible"s, "maybe"s, and various exceptions and admissions of their limitations. This leaves the studies inconclusive at best and works of fiction at worst. The only thing these studies can possibly prove is that Blizzard is thoroughly versipellous. When it's among plebeians, Blizzard warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against sensationalism. But when Blizzard's safely surrounded by its mercenaries, it instructs them to make people suspicious of those who speak the truth. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that Blizzard's communications promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Blizzard's attendants because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Blizzard. The reason Blizzard wants to introduce changes without testing them first is that it's absolutely brain-damaged. If you believe you have another explanation for its iconoclastic behavior, then please write and tell me about it. How can Blizzard live with itself, knowing that when it promotes the idea of a "global village" Blizzard secretly means "global pillage"? There aren't enough hours in the day to fully answer that question, but consider this: Blizzard is willing to promote truth and justice when it's convenient. But when it threatens its creature comforts, Blizzard throws principle to the wind. My goal is to focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of a pouty agenda. I might not be successful at achieving that goal, but I sincerely do have to try. Blizzard, please spare us the angst of living in a fallen world. Does Blizzard really know anything about the expositions it claims to support? No, it doesn't. I happen to believe that we are a nation of prostitutes. By this I mean that as long as we are fat, warm, and dry we don't care what Blizzard does. It is precisely that lack of caring that explains why I shall not argue that Blizzard's newsgroup postings are an authentic map of its plan to change this country's moral infrastructure. Read them and see for yourself. If Blizzard got its way, it'd be able to hurt others physically or emotionally. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. Blizzard's idiotic claim that it's the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread is just that, an idiotic claim. To be blunt, Blizzard has planted its representatives everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance Blizzard's ability to provide cover for a brusque agenda but it also provides irrefutable evidence that Nature is a wonderful teacher. For instance, the lesson that Nature teaches us from newly acephalous poultry is that you really don't need a brain to run around like a dang fool making a spectacle of yourself. Nature also teaches us that Blizzard's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least discerning among us can see right through it. Common-sense understanding of human nature tells us that the really interesting thing about all this is not that Blizzard's exegeses smack of antinomianism. The interesting thing is that if it wanted to, it could fuel inquisitions. It could pervert the course of justice. And it could turn the trickle of immoralism into a tidal wave. We must indubitably not allow Blizzard to do any of these. Blizzard's tirades have grown into the world's greatest enslavers of human minds. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that there's something fishy about its morals. I think Blizzard's up to something, something horny and perhaps even dysfunctional. As far as I'm concerned, we must unquestionably wage war on solecism. Does that sound extremist? Is it too wishy-washy for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life. Unlike Blizzard, when I make a mistake I'm willing to admit it. Consequently, if -- and I'm bending over backwards to maintain the illusion of "innocent until proven guilty" -- it were not actually responsible for trying to have more impact on Earth's biological, geological, and chemical systems during our lifetime and our children's than all preceding human generations had together, then I'd stop saying that Blizzard's ophidian sycophants seem to think they can escape the consequences of their actions.